Catalyst for production of cycloalkylaromatics

ABSTRACT

Cycloalkylaromatics are produced from aromatic hydrocarbons in the presence of hydrogen and a catalyst consisting essentially of ruthenium, nickel and a support material selected from the group consisting of active clay and silica-alumina.

This is a divisional of application Ser. No. 608,597, filed Aug. 28,1975, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,115,463.

This invention relates to the conversion of aromatic hydrocarbons tocycloalkylaromatics and/or alkyl-substituted cycloalkylaromatics. In oneaspect, this invention relates to an improved process for the conversionof aromatics to cycloalkylaromatics. In another aspect, this inventionrelates to an improved catalyst for the conversion of aromatics tocycloalkylaromatics.

Methods are available in the art for the coupling of aromatic nuclei inthe presence of molecular hydrogen to produce an at least partiallyhydrogenated dimer derivative of the aromatic reactant. For example,benzene is converted at an elevated temperature to a mixture containingcyclohexylbenzene in the presence of various catalysts.Cyclohexylbenzene is known as a valuable solvent and chemicalintermediate. It can be converted in high yield to phenol andcyclohexanone by autooxidation with subsequent acid treatments. None ofthe prior art methods have yet been proven for a stable continuousoperation necessary for commercial exploitation. Problems therewithinclude high catalyst cost, catalyst stability, and regeneration.

An object of the present invention is to provide an improved process forthe conversion of aromatic hydrocarbons to cycloalkylaromatichydrocarbons.

Another object of the present invention is to provide an improvedcatalyst for the production of cycloalkylaromatic hydrocarbons.

Other objects, aspects and the several advantages of the invention willbe apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the specificationand appended claims.

In accordance with the present invention there is provided a process forproducing cycloalkylaromatics and alkyl-substituted cycloalkylaromaticsfrom aromatic hydrocarbons by contacting a monocyclic aromatichydrocarbon with hydrogen in the presence of a catalyst consistingessentially of ruthenium, nickel and a solid support material selectedfrom the group consisting of active clay and synthetic silica-aluminaunder conditions sufficient to convert the monocyclic aromatichydrocarbons to cycloalkylaromatics and alkyl-substitutedcycloalkylaromatics, and thereafter recovering the desired product.

The present process is effected in the presence of a clay-supported or asilica-alumina-supported ruthenium/nickel catalyst. The ruthenium andnickel are applied to the active clay or synthetic silica-aluminasupport material as alcoholic or aqueous solutions of a ruthenium halidesalt, preferably ruthenium trichloride, and nickel bromide, such asnickel dibromide trihydrate.

The catalyst preparation involves no calcination but simply involves theimpregnation of the active clay or silica-alumina with a solutioncontaining ruthenium and nickel, such as an ethanol or water solution ofruthenium trichloride and nickel bromide trihydrate. The impregnation ofthe support material with the ruthenium and nickel compounds can becarried out simultaneously with a single impregnating solution orsequentially with separate solutions. The amount and concentration ofthe impregnating solution should be sufficient to provide the desiredruthenium and nickel concentrations in the finished catalyst.

Following impregnation the catalytic composite is dried to remove thevolatile solvent at atmospheric pressure or at reduced pressure. Thecatalytic composite can be further dried by heating at temperatures inthe approximate range of 25° to 380° C., preferably from 25° to 120° C.The heating is continued for a period of time and under conditionssufficient to remove substantially all of the solvent but insufficientto calcine the catalyst composition.

The catalytic composite can be used in the powder form or as tablets.Tablets of the support material can be prepared and impregnated withruthenium and nickel, or the powder can be impregnated and thenconverted to tablets. In the preparation of tablets it is advantageousto incorporate about three weight percent graphite as a processing aid.It is desirable that the tablets have a crush strength of 5-10 pounds.

The catalysts of this invention contain ruthenium and nickel in thefollowing amounts:

    ______________________________________                                                     Broad      Preferred                                             ______________________________________                                        Ruthenium, wt. %                                                                             0.01-0.3     0.03-0.1                                          Nickel, wt. %  0.03-1.0     0.1-0.6                                           Ru:Ni (w/w)    0.01:1-0.3:1 0.1:1-0.25:1                                      ______________________________________                                    

The above weight percents are based upon the weight of the supportmaterial and are calculated as the metal.

After impregnation and drying, the catalyst composite is ready for usein the process of this invention. However, it is generally advantageousto treat the catalyst prior to contact with the aromatic feedstock byflowing hydrogen over the catalyst for 0.1-10 hours at 100°-275° C.

As indicated above, the support material for the catalyst of thisinvention is an activated clay or a synthetic silica-alumina. Goodresults are obtained when a support characterized by montmorillonitestructure is impregnated with an alcoholic or aqueous solution ofruthenium trichloride and nickel dibromide trihydrate followed byheating to remove the solvent. Suitable clays are availablecommercially, as for example, Filtrol Grade 71, Filtrol Grade 49 and thelike (available from Filtrol Corporation, Vernon, Calif. A typicalanalysis of the Filtrol Grade 71 clay is as follows: 71.2% SiO₂, 16.5%Al₂ O₃, 3.6% Fe₂ O₃, 3.2% MgO, 2.6% CaO, 1.3% SO₃, 1.0% (K₂ O+Na₂ O) and0.6% TiO₂ (analysis on a volatile free basis). Filtrol Grade 49 clay hasthe following analysis: 74.0% SiO₂, 17.5% Al₂ O₃, 4.5% MgO and 1.4% Fe₂O₃ with the balance not specified by Filtrol Corp. Filtrol Grade 49 wasanalyzed by the supplier after heating the Filtrol sample at 1700° F. Inthis heat treatment Filtrol Grade 49 lost 17% volatiles.

In addition to the montmorillonite clays, other catalyst grade syntheticsilica-alumina materials, containing a major proportion of silica and aminor proportion of alumina, i.e., at least about 50 weight percentsilica, can be used in the preparation of the catalysts of thisinvention. Particularly effective are the acidic syntheticsilica-aluminas having activity as cracking catalysts. An example ofsuch a support material is Durabead silica-alumina, availablecommercially from Mobile Chemical Co., 150 East 42nd St., N.Y., N.Y.10017.

The feedstocks which are suitable for use in the present invention aremonocyclic aromatic or alkyl-substituted monocyclic aromatic compoundshaving from 6 to 10 carbon atoms per molecule. Examples of suitablearomatic compounds include benzene, toluene, the xylenes,isobutylbenzene and the like, and mixtures thereof.

The aromatic conversion according to the present invention can becarried out in the presence of the above-described catalysts at atemperature in the approximate range of 100°-275° C., preferably185°-250° C. When using a catalyst prepared from active clay supportmaterials, a reaction temperature less than about 220° C., preferably inthe range of 190°-215° C., is preferred for best results. When using acatalyst prepared from a synthetic silica-alumina support material areaction temperature above about 225° C., preferably 225°-230° C., ispreferred for best results.

The aromatic conversion is carried out at a hydrogen pressure in theapproximate range of 100 to 2000 psig, preferably from 400 to 600 psig.

The present invention can be carried out batchwise or as a continuousprocess. Continuous operation is more suitable for commercialutilization. In a continuous process, the aromatic hydrocarbon-hydrogenfeed can be passed over a fixed bed catalyst in an upflow or downflowmanner. In a continuous operation the feedstock is contacted with thecatalyst at a space velocity, defined as volume of the liquid feed pervolume of catalyst per hour (LHSV), in the approximate range of 1 to 45,preferably 20-35.

The present invention is advantageously carried out under substantiallyanhydrous conditions.

The process of this invention can be carried out in the presence of orin the substantial absence of added reation solvents or diluents. In themodification wherein added solvent is employed, the diluents which areliquid at reaction temperature and pressure and are inert to thecatalyst, reactants and reaction products are suitably employed.Preferred diluents to be utilized in this modification are saturatedhydrocarbons of 5-10 carbon atoms, e.g., acyclic alkanes such aspentane, hexane, heptane, octane, nonane and decane, as well ascycloalkanes, such as cyclopentane, cyclohexane, cycloheptane,cyclooctane, cyclononane, cyclodecane and the like and mixtures thereof.The presently preferred diluent is cyclohexane.

The desired product can be isolated and recovered by any convenientmeans such as by fractionation. The unconverted feedstock can berecycled to the reaction zone.

In a presently preferred embodiment of the invention, benzene,preferably containing little if any sulfur, is contacted at atemperature in the approximate range of 185° to 250° C., at a LHSV inthe approximate range of 20-35 and under a hydrogen pressure in theapproximate range of 400-600 psig with a catalyst consisting essentiallyof ruthenium and nickel on an active clay or silica-alumina support,which catalyst has been prepared by impregnating the support with anethanolic solution of a ruthenium halide and nickel bromide followed byheating to remove the solvent (ethanol) under non-calcining conditionsat a temperature below about 380° C., but sufficient to volatilize andremove the ethanol from the impregnated catalyst. Cyclohexylbenzene isrecovered from the reaction mixture.

The following examples illustrate the invention:

EXAMPLE I (A) Catalyst Preparation

Twenty-five grams of Filtrol Grade 49, 20-30 mesh, which had beenpreviously heated at 293° C. for two hours, was impregnated with about80 ml of an ethanolic solution containing 0.0309 g. rutheniumtrichloride and 0.2024 g. nickel chloride hexahydrate. The ethanol wasremoved under reduced pressure on a rotary evaporator and the catalystwas dried overnight at room temperature. The resulting catalyst wascalculated to contain 0.05 weight percent Ru and 0.20 weight percent Ni.

(B) Cyclohexylbenzene Run 1

A 5/8"×18" stainless steel pipe downflow trickle bed reactor was chargedwith 25 ml Pyrex glass beads followed by 15 ml (10.9 g.) of the abovecatalyst and topped by additional Pyrex glass beads to give a totalcharged volume of about 25 ml. The system was pressure checked, heatedto 150° C., and pressured to 500 psig with hydrogen for 15 minutes.During a reaction period of four hours, benzene was pumped into thestainless steel tube reactor at a rate of 300 ml/hr (LHSV=20) at ahydrogen pressure of 500 psig and a temperature of 215° C. The reactoreffluent was collected in a receiver which was changed at approximatelyone hour intervals, and the composition of each sample was determined bygas chromatographic analysis. The gas chromatographic analyses ofsamples taken during the last four hours of a run were averaged and theresults showed a 1.4% conversion based on benzene, with a selectivity of62% to cyclohexylbenzene and 19% to cyclohexane. The ratio ofcyclohexylbenzene/cyclohexane (CHB/CH) was 3.3.

EXAMPLE II (A) Catalyst Preparation

Twenty-five grams of Filtrol Grade 49, 20-30 mesh, which had beenpreviously heated at 293° C. for two hours was sprayed with a solutioncontaining about 30 ml absolute ethanol, 3 ml water, 0.0309 g. rutheniumtrichloride and 0.2315 g. nickel bromide trihydrate. The catalyst wasair dried overnight at room temperature. The resulting catalyst wascalculated to contain 0.05 weight percent Ru and 0.20 weight percent Ni.

(B) Cyclohexylbenzene Run 2

A charge of 15 ml (12.2 g) of the above catalyst was placed in astainless steel pipe reactor (5/8"×18") bedded with Pyrex glass beads.The system was pressure checked, purged with nitrogen and hydrogenbefore treating the catalyst at 150° C. under 500 psig H₂ for a periodof 15 minutes. Benzene was then pumped into the reactor at a rate of 300ml/hr (LHSV=20) during a reaction period of seven hours at about 210°and a hydrogen pressure of 500 psig. The gas chromatographic analyses ofsamples taken over the seven hour reaction period were averaged and theresults showed a 14% conversion based on benzene with a selectivity of9.5% to cyclohexane and 76.7% to cyclohexylbenzene. The CHB/CH ratio forthis run was 8.1.

The results shown in Table I below illustrate that the Runs of ExamplesI and II, in which the catalysts contain relatively small amounts ofruthenium, both produced significant amounts of the desiredcyclohexylbenzene. In addition, it is also clearly seen that thecatalyst prepared using NiBr₂ is much superior to that using NiC1₂.

                  Table I                                                         ______________________________________                                        Production of Cyclohexylbenzene                                                    Components,              %      CHB  Ratio                               Ex.  wt. %      Temp.         Con-   Sel. CHB/                                No.  Ru     Ni      °C.                                                                          LHSV  version                                                                              %    CH                                ______________________________________                                        I    0.05   0.20.sup.a                                                                            215   20    1.4    62   3.3                               II   0.05   0.20.sup.b                                                                            210   20    14.0   76.7 8.1                               ______________________________________                                         .sup.a Ni present as NiCl.sub.2.                                              .sup.b Ni present as NiBr.sub.2.                                         

EXAMPLE III (A) Catalyst Preparation

A 25 g. sample of Filtrol Grade 71 was sprayed with a solutioncontaining about 20 ml ethanol, 1 ml water, 0.0309 g. rutheniumtrichloride and 0.2315 nickel bromide trihydrate. The catalyst was airdried overnight at room temperature. The resulting catalyst wascalculated to contain 0.05 weight percent Ru and 0.20 weight percent Ni.

(B) Cyclohexylbenzene Run 3

A 15 ml (9.7 g.) portion of the above catalyst (0.05 wt. % Ru, 0.20 wt.% Ni on Filtrol Grade 71) was placed in the stainless steel tubularreactor of Example I bedded with Pyrex glass beads. The reactor waspressure checked and purged with nitrogen before pressuring to 500 psigH₂ and heating to 150° C. over a period of 15 minutes. Benzene waspumped into the reactor at a rate of 300 ml/hr (LHSV=20) and a five hourrun was carried out at a pressure of about 500 psig H₂ and at atemperature of about 200° C. The gas chromatographic analyses of samplestaken during the five hour run were averaged and the results showed an8.2% conversion based on benzene with a selectivity of 8.5% tocyclohexane and 79.2% to cyclohexylbenzene. The CHB/CH(cyclohexylbenzene/cyclohexane) ratio was 9.3 showing the relativelyhigh selectivity of the inventive catalyst for the production of thedesired cyclohexylbenzene.

EXAMPLE IV (A) Catalyst Preparation

A 20 g. sample of 20-30 mesh silica-alumina (Mobil Durabead crackingcatalyst) containing about 56 weight percent silica and about 44 weightpercent alumina was sprayed with a solution prepared by dissolving0.0245 g. ruthenium trichloride and 0.2787 g. nickel bromide trihydratein about 20 ml absolute ethanol and 1 ml water. The catalyst was driedovernight at room temperature. The resulting catalyst was calculated tocontain 0.05 weight percent Ru and 0.30 weight percent Ni.

(B) Cyclohexylbenzene Run 4

The stainless steel pipe reactor of Example I was charged with 25 ml of3 mm Pyrex glass beads, 10 ml (8.5 g.) of the above catalyst and thenadditional glass beads to fill the reactor to a volume of about 30 ml.The system was pressure checked and the catalyst was treated bymaintaining the reactor contents of about 150° C. for 15 minutes under500 psig hydrogen. Benzene when then pumped into the reactor at a rateof 334 ml/hr (LHSV=34.4) during a reaction period of six hours at about225° C. and a hydrogen pressure of 500 psig. The gas chromatographicanalyses of samples taken over the six hour reaction period wereaveraged and the results showed and 8% conversion based on benzene witha selectivity of 13.8% to cyclohexane and 78.8% to cyclohexylbenzene.The CHB/CH (cyclohexylbenzene/cyclohexane) ratio for this run was 5.7.

The run described in Example IV above illustrates the process of thepresent invention on a synthetic silica alumina support at therelatively higher temperature of 225° C.

EXAMPLE V (A) Catalyst Preparation

A 20 g. sample of a 20-30 mesh catalyst grade silica-alumina, obtainedby crushing and sieving extrudates which contained about 87% silica andabout 13 weight percent alumina, was sprayed with a solution prepared bydissolving 0.0250 g. ruthenium trichloride and 0.2774 g. nickel bromidetrihydrate in about 20 ml absolute ethanol and one milliliter of water.The catalyst was dried overnight at room temperature. The resultingcatalyst was calculated to contain 0.05 weight percent Ru and 0.30weight percent Ni.

(B) Cyclohexylbenzene Run

Into a stainless steel pipe reactor bedded with Pyrex glass beads wascharged about 15 ml (7.4 g.) of the above catalyst and additional glassbeads were introduced on top of the catalyst to fill the reactor volume.The system was pressure checked, heated to 150° C., and pressured to 500psig with hydrogen for 15 minutes. During a reaction period of about 3.5hours, benzene was pumped into the reactor at a rate of about 300 ml/hr(LHSV=20) at a hydrogen pressure of 500 psig and a temperature in therange of 210°-230° C. The gas chromatographic analyses of samples takenover the 3.5 hour reaction period were averaged and the results showedabout 9% conversion based on benzene with a selectivity of 31% tocyclohexane and 55% to cyclohexylbenzene. The CHB/CH(cyclohexylbenzene/cyclohexane) ratio for this run was about 1.9. Therelatively high conversion and selectivity for this run illustrate therelatively high per-pass yield of desired product utilizing the processof the present invention.

Reasonable variations and modifications, which will be apparent to thoseskilled in the art, can be made in this invention without departing fromthe spirit and scope thereof.

What is claimed is:
 1. A catalyst for the conversion of monocyclicaromatic and alkyl-substituted monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsconsisting essentially of from about 0.01 to 0.3 weight percentruthenium, from about 0.03 to 1 weight percent nickel and a supportmaterial selected from the group consisting of active clay and syntheticsilica-alumina in a weight ratio of ruthenium to nickel in theapproximate range of 0.01 to 0.3:1.
 2. The catalyst of claim 1 whereinsaid nickel is present in said catalyst as nickel bromide.
 3. Thecatalyst of claim 1 wherein said support is active clay.
 4. The catalystof claim 1 wherein said support is synthetic silica-alumina.
 5. Thecatalyst of claim 1 wherein said ruthenium is present in said catalystin an approximate amount ranging from 0.03 to 0.1 weight percent andsaid nickel is present in said catalyst in an approximate amount rangingfrom 0.1 to 0.6 weight percent.
 6. The catalyst of claim 1 wherein saidratio of ruthenium to nickel is in the approximate range of 0.1:1 to0.25:1.